Q&A of the Day ā To Retain or Not Retain Floridaās Supreme Court JusticesĀ
Each day I feature a listener question sent by one of these methods.Ā Ā
Email: brianmudd@iheartmedia.comĀ Ā
Gettr, Parler & Twitter: @brianmuddradioĀ Ā
iHeartRadio: Use the Talkback feature ā the microphone button on our stationās page in the iHeart app.Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā
Todayās entry: I have been on the internet looking for information on the judges up for reappointment. Itās so important and would appreciate any guidance you could provide. Listen to you every day.Ā
&Ā
You said you were going to cover judicial races, shortly. Will that include information on whether Supreme Court and District court judges shall be retained? Are there groups which track these judges bases on conservative or progressive decisions from which we could make an educated choice? Thanks for any help you can give.Ā
Bottom Line: Itās official, Iāve now received more inquiries regarding information for the judges on our ballots this November than Iāve received requests for the proposed constitutional amendments, which is a first. These two notes are among many Iāve fielded of late. Ask and you shall receive. Iām going to provide an overview and starting point for the judicial considerations on our ballots this November. These elections include the state Supreme Court and 3rd and 4th District Court of Appeals. In todayās Q&A Iāll address the Florida Supreme Court retention elections which are on all Floridians ballots. Tomorrow Iāll address the judges under consideration in South Floridaās 3rd and 4th District courts.Ā Ā
First hereās an overview of how I evaluate judicial candidates in these races...Ā
- I start by seeing if thereās anything specific to them that Iām familiar with that I have had strong feelings about. IE: Court rulings. Next, search for information about them online. This often includes background data such as the political party they may be registered to, associations and background information.Ā
So here goes with a brief overview of each candidate starting with the Florida Supreme Court Justices:Ā
- Charles Canady: Republican, Chief Justice of the Florida Supreme Court. Original judicial appointment was by Governor Jeb Bush, current appointment was by Governor Charlie Crist in 2008. Has been retained twice by votersĀ
- John Couriel: Republican, Appointed by Governor DeSantis in 2020. This is his first retention electionĀ
- Jamie Grosshans: NPA, original judicial appointment was by Governor Rick Scott, current appointment was by Governor DeSantis in 2020Ā
- Jorge Labarga: NPA, original appointment was by Governor Charlie Crist in 2009, has been retained twice by votersĀ
- Ricky Polston: NPA, original appointment was by Governor Charlie Crist in 2009, has been retained twice by votersĀ
In addition to that overall information, one of the questions asked was if there are groups which provide additional information based on how progressive or conservative they may be. There are and if you search around, youāll likely find some recs accordingly. Personally, I have a great deal of respect for the presentation of Ballotpedia ā which is the most comprehensive repository of election related information available online. They provide what they call a āPartisan Profileā of each of these justices. Hereās what they have to say about each of these justices:Ā
- Charles Canady: Rated a āMild RepublicanāĀ Ā
- John Couriel: Rated a āStrong RepublicanāĀ
- Jamie Grosshans: Choose not to participate in Ballotpediaās Candidate Connection process & doesnāt have a partisan profile ratingĀ
- Jorge Labarga: Rated a āMild RepublicanāĀ
- Ricky Polston: Rated a āMild RepublicanāĀ
Now, I strongly encourage you to look into the information a bit further yourself. The links included in this story provide extensive background information for these candidates, but in general thatās the lay of the land with these candidates. Tomorrow Iāll address judges under consideration in South Floridaās 3rd and 4th District courts.Ā