Global Warming Alarmists are wrong about South Florida
Bottom Line: Yesterday the activist organization of scientists known as the Union of Concerned Scientists put out their latest dire global warming forecast for the country, including South Florida – which tops the list for impact. Now, my calling them an activist organization isn’t my characterization – it's theirs. Yet, if you came across their dire predictions, you likely didn’t have that context presented to you. Here’s something else you haven’t had presented to you. How incredibly wrong they, and the related scientific doomsayers have been.
I haven’t made a career out of being wrong. Remarkably these people have. Here’s how this works. Create models that show man-made factors are the biggest factor in climate change, whip people and politicians up into a frenzy. Get people, organizations and government grants donated to your organization – wash and repeat. Here’s what never happens. Accountability.
There’s a reason I start climate-change discussions off with this point, this scientific fact: Earth has had a minimum of three mass extinction events prior to man. We know empirically through actual science, not BS projections masked as the scientific process (which it’s literally the antithesis of), that we’ve had mass extinction events of both extreme heat and cold. That’s incredible climate change on earth before we were here with our carbon footprints.
On that basis alone, anyone who suggests that what we’re doing is more powerful than earth’s natural climate change is a literal science denier. We’re nowhere close to doing to this planet, what it naturally did to itself before us. On that note. Here’s a fact check for these pseudo-scientific predictions.
An actual scientific study of global warming predictions in the scientific journal Nature Climate Change studied 117 predictions made over a decade. 114 over-estimated near-term temperature rises. That’s right only 2.5% of near-term temperature estimates didn’t over project temperature rise. Let me put this another way. They’re wrong 97.5% of the time. And not by a little bit either. The average miss over-estimated the rate of temperature increase by 285%.
Now, if you were wrong nearly 98% of the time at work and off by an average factor of three how long would you have a job? Who would take you seriously? This is but the latest illustration of how fake our news is and how corrupted climate science has become.