Q&A – Why Legacy News Outlets are Finally Covering Hunter Biden
Each day I feature a listener question sent by one of these methods.
Email: brianmudd@iheartmedia.com
Gettr, Parler & Twitter: @brianmuddradio
iHeartRadio: Use the Talkback feature – the microphone button on our station’s page in the iHeart app.
Today’s Entry: Submitted via the Talkback feature.
Bottom Line: The benefit of doing real investigative journalism, and having investigated and covered the Trump-Russia collusion fraud since 2016 (which is directly tied to the Hunter Biden laptop scandal, as Hunter Biden’s exploits were the real-life stories used in the Steel dossier) - is that I investigated the Kerry angle years ago. I’ll bring you my findings in a minute. But first, let’s talk about why the mainstream news media is finally talking about this. He might be indicted. Hunter Biden could be be indicted. And think about this. Even with the New York Times finally covering the story and the Washington Post joining Wednesday – think about how non-substantial the coverage has been.
No, Hunter Biden isn’t the President of the United States, but he is the son who did the bidding of his dad when he was Vice-President. For three years we were subjected to the daily drumbeat of Trump-Russia collusion which was based on a Dossier that’s in reality the Hunter Biden story. Not only did the dishonest news media discredit this story leading up to the 2020 election in aiding Joe Biden chances... They continued not to cover it during his entire first year plus as president. So back to why this is happening. As has now been acknowledged by the previously dishonest mainstream news media – Hunter Biden has been under federal investigation for alleged misfeasance in business dealings with China, Russia and Ukraine since 2019. 2019 – a year before the presidential election. Incidentally, what countries are in the news every day? Why is it once again that this isn’t the biggest story every day? But anyway – the reason news outlets are finally covering this story is that up to now the only on-the-record coverage they’d provide was their effort to discredit the laptop and the story to carry the Biden water. By covering it now – when the indictment goes down – they’ll point to having covered the story in advance. So, now about Kerry’s...
On October 9th of 2019 – I brought you this as part of that day’s Q&A in relation to my coverage of the Hunter Biden laptop/investigation (Specifically, the question that was asked was if John Kerry’s son was tied to the alleged corruption)...
Alright, by now you’re aware that Hunter Biden served on the board of Burisma, the largest Ukranian natural gas company. Chris Heinz's firm, John Kerry’s stepson, was partnered with Hunter Biden in 2014 on various investment ventures. Chris not only wasn’t on the board of directors for a Ukranian energy company, he literally severed all relationships with Hunter Biden when Hunter joined the board of Burisma. Chris was rightly concerned about corruption and didn’t want to have anything to do with the Ukranian energy business or anyone involved with them.
So, two points, that’s what I was investigating and covering two and a half years ago specific to this dynamic of the story. Once again who has been proved more credible and reliable. The New York Times, the Washington Post, the alphabet networks? You get the point. The second point, obviously my investigating cleared the Kerry’s of involvement with the Bidens pertaining to China, Russia, Ukrainian collusion. In fact, as I went on to say back then – the fact that Chris Heinz, who had been a longtime business partner with Hunter Biden, immediately severed all ties to Hunter as soon as he accepted the role on the board of Burisma, only added further validity to the perceived corruption set to take place with the association. So no, the Biden corruption is very much a Biden specific agenda.
Now, for those who might just be coming into all of this information, welcome to the show and welcome to where the truth happens. You also might be wondering why or how it would make sense for Hunter to have been colluding with Chinese interests at the same time as Russian interests at the same time as Ukrainian interests. After all, Russia’s at war with Ukraine now. The difference back then is that the Ukrainian government was a corrupt quasi-puppet of Russia. Under threat from Putin, the previous government was giving Russia enough of what Putin wanted to keep him focused on targets like Crimea – which the Ukrainian government played ball with Putin on. The fallout between Russia and Ukraine began with the election of President Zelenski, a reformer who cleaned house and refused to play ball with Putin.
As always, there are two sides to stories and one side to facts. You know where to come for those. At times years in advance of when the picture comes together.