Paid off to disrupt the SCOTUS hearing and ignored by alleged news media
Bottom Line: These are stories you shouldn't miss and my takes on them...
Three Texas Doctors: We Saw Protesters Paid In Cash To Disrupt Kavanaugh Hearing On Line To Enter - Real Clear Politics
Excerpt: I'm Dr. Tom Schlieder from Texas, we came here to participate to the hearings, to get in the line. They told us to be here at 8:00, 8:30 at the latest, to get in line to go inside hear the hearings. We got here at about 8:15 and there was already 100 people in line, and most of them would be probably classified by me as opposing everything going on with Judge Kavanaugh, and so we began to see a process of things unfolding as we were standing in line that kept the line from going ahead.
One thing was there were people who had come along... had a bag of money, and people would hand them a piece of paper, and then they would give them money. So we know money was exchanged for some of the people to be here just to protest.
There was no depth to what they were understanding, they were just here to be a disruption, protesters. They were actually told, we heard them say this, 'when you go in, we want you to yell, to scream, and even possibly to get arrested. So that was some of the processes we saw happening...
Hot Take: Omitting, being the most pervasive form of bias, you’ve likely not heard about these accounts... Just as media commonly ignored evidence that protesters rebel rousing at Trump rallies during the 2016 election were also paid off to be there and cause trouble. Instead, you’ve likely heard about “democracy” taking place. There’s nothing democratic about paid operatives doing whatever they can to disrupt the nomination process of a Supreme Court nominee. Ignoring the fact that democracy doesn’t exist, in this country or any other in the world for a moment, ironically enough what happened is the antithesis of democracy. Democracy, in this context, were non-paid Americans going to the polls and voting for a President of the United States who’d make the SCOTUS nomination and United States senators who’d consider and vote on the nominee.
I’m increasingly of the belief that the combination of decades of inferior education combined with media that’s hell bent on political outcomes above all else is a dangerous combination. There’s no excuse for everything I just reported, to not be a top story everywhere. Were those who pay people off to disrupt our system of government exposed by those in media who’re tasked with reporting news and exposing this type corruption on display...it’d likely stop. But clearly that’s not the intent of the news media that’s provided 91% negative news coverage to the Trump administration. Go figure.