Q&A – The Roger Stone raid in Fort Lauderdale, Part 2 what we now know
Bottom Line: In the first part of today’s Q&A, I dispelled the myth that CNN had to be tipped off to have been onsite for the Stone raid Friday morning. In the second part of today’s story I’ll break down the second part of today’s question. Why Roger Stone?
As for Stone’s situation, the status of the Mueller probe etc... Here’s the deal. It’s clear through previous information and with details from the indictment that this happened, in likely this order:
- Wikileaks hacked the DNC email server
- Jerome Corsi, then at Infowars, was contacted by Wikileaks
- Corsi contacted Roger Stone about the contents of the emails
- Roger Stone contacted someone within Trump’s inner circle about the emails
It’s worth noting that other than Wikileaks appearing to have been the hacker in the DNC server in the first place, nothing Corsi or Stone did was illegal. Being that’s the case Corsi appeared to cooperate with Muller’s investigation but Stone did not. It’s Roger Stone’s defiance/obstruction that led him to this point. In other words, it doesn’t appear as though he broke any laws during the 2016 cycle being investigated. He potentially broke them during the investigation. Here’s what’s real at this point...
- It’s likely that Roger Stone’s lack of cooperation with the Muller investigation slowed the process down
- It’s likely we’ve not seen the end of the Muller probe as he’s doubtless in pursuit of whomever it was in Trump’s circle
- There’s still no Trump/Russia Collusion
There are two sides to stories and one side to facts. These are the facts as we know them today...