DJT & BiBi Can Prevent WWIII – Top 3 Takeaways – October 16th, 2024
- Israel not the United States will decide how Israel handles Iran. Question for you. Let’s say that you’re going into a battle that’s a matter of life and death for you and those your fellow countrymen. You have two choices as to who will lead you into battle, making the decisions about what happens when you get there. One option is Benjamin Netanyahu. Your other option is Joe Biden. Who are you tapping to lead you? Who do you think is the leader who really wins that battle? And would Kamala being in Joe’s place really change your choice? The election that takes place in 20 days is about many things. The border, the economy and even whether we should have taxpayer funded child trannies. But it’s also about who we want at the controls as the world remains on fire and is on the brink of World War III? Who do you think stands a better chance of winning that war should it come? Better still, who do you think prevents that war from ever happening because of the strength they project to the world’s bad actors? Friday night while having dinner with some friends I observed that the reason the United States has consistently lost wars when we’ve engaged in them over the past 50+ years is due to our desire to fight politically correct wars when faced with enemies who will fight to win by any means necessary. In Israel we see that the reason they’re winning the wars that have been brought to them is because...
- They aren’t afraid to do what needs to be done to win. On Tuesday, in response to the Biden administration's statement that Israel needs to accept a permanent cease fire in the region (because of course the terrorists who started this can be trusted to stick to it), and the administration's statement that Netanyahu was in a “more moderate place” Netanyahu publicly spoke for himself saying: We listen to the opinions of the United States, but we will make our final decisions based on our national interest. Which by the way also happens to be in the national interest of the United States and frankly every country that doesn’t believe that raping, torturing and murdering people who don’t praise Muhammad should be standard operating procedure. Heck, even the would-be taxpayer funded child trannies benefit. Actually, in that culture, they’d be among the top beneficiaries as they kill homosexuals in that society. On that note, the greatest oxymoron (with emphasis on moron) of the American left are the rainbow warriors who want to “free Palestine”. Boy would they be surprised by what would happen if they were free to carry out their wishes with them. But anyway, back to the election at hand and the implications that lie ahead. Eight years ago, at about this time, ISIS had established a caliphate in Europe routinely carrying out terrorist attacks in this country (you know after Barack Obama called on the Muslim Brotherhood to rise up years earlier...which they did). Donald Trump promised to bomb the blank out of them if he was elected. He won, he bombed the blank out of them, and in a matter of months the ever-growing reign of terror by ISIS was over. This time around, with Afghanistan having collapsed once again to Islamic terrorists, Russia having invaded Ukraine, and every middle eastern terroristic organization attacking Israel, led by the largest state sponsor of terror in the world, Iran...(which isn’t just Iran because Iran is China, is Russia, is North Korea with Little Rocket Man, is Cuba, Venezuela, is Nicaragua...)
- The stakes are much higher. Unless something even more dramatic than what we’ve seen transpires between now and Election Day, this election is going to turn on the typical issues that motivate voters... the economy, affordability, the border, crime, and social issues currently led by abortion. But when on the brink of WWIII who do you think is the best equipped to prevent it? Donald Trump who bombs the blank out of terrorists until they’re done? Or Kamala Harris and her pheasant hunter who apparently doesn’t know how to load the gun? And what’s best about Trump 2.0 is that he isn’t the one who needs to do the bombing. Bibi will do what needs to be done to prevent WWIII by bombing the blank out of the enemies this time around. Four years ago, we had the most peaceful world of our lifetimes. Today there’s as much war as there’s been since we dropped bombs on Japan. What changed? Back to my original question. Four years ago, this country took just about everything for granted and decided to take ‘Ole Joe and Cackling Kamala into battle. How well did that one work out? But here’s the thing. As bad as it is in many parts of the world right now, what hasn’t brought it directly to us, and about the only thing keeping the world from potentially entering World War III is the threat of Donald Trump becoming president-elect in 20 days. The world’s bad actors don’t want to have to take on Bibi and DJT. As Trump said before the Economic Club of Chicago yesterday... I talked countries out of wars, which was true. That’s what happens when there’s peace through strength. If we want relative peace in the middle east and around the world... It’s incumbent upon us to vote for someone who projects strength as opposed to cackles.