An Undeniable Pattern of Preferential Treatment & It’s Impact on You – Top 3 Takeaways – July 20th, 2023
- Undeniable pattern of preferential treatment. Any objective observer, or for that matter, even remotely honest person who has paid any attention to what’s happened in Washington D.C. in recent years would know that there has been an undeniable pattern of preferential treatment for Democrats who’ve been running for president, and in the case of the current occupant of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, became president. We’ve gone from James Comey’s “no reasonable prosecutor” speech, when depicting the various crimes committed with classified material illegally stored on personal servers owned by Hillary Clinton stemming from her time as Secretary of State (which included obstruction of justice in destroying the physical evidence), to Donald Trump being indicted for storing a fraction of the classified material at Mar-a-Lago. We’ve had crackhead Hunter Biden miraculously become a board member for a corrupt Ukrainian energy company which paid him millions while his dad was Vice-President with Ukrainian oversight. He demanded the firing of the Ukrainian prosecutor investigating the corrupt energy company his crackhead son worked at over the threat of losing US foreign aid. Meanwhile, we’ve had Donald Trump indicted over hush money payments to Stormy freaking Danials. We then had the crackhead son become “business partners” with Chinese Communist Party Controlled entities which paid him and the “big guy” millions while his dad sat next to him providing the leverage needed for the payday. And now we’re about to have Donald Trump indicted for insurrection. And that’s not to speak of the, at this point theoretical, Joe Biden classified docs investigation? Seriously, does anyone know if that special prosecutor is even with the living – let alone investigating anything? Maybe that case will be closed just about the time Trump’s indicted for whatever the Atlanta D.A. decides to charge Trump with. Maybe having had the audacity to be born? Yes, no doubt there’s been an undeniable pattern of preferential treatment received by the Bidens.
- And that’s exactly what the IRS whistleblowers testified to before the House Oversight Committee yesterday. Along with the wrinkle that the previously anonymous IRS whistleblower was a 13-year IRS Special Agent within the IRS’s Criminal Investigation Division. Oh, and that he is a gay Democrat married to man. According to said whistleblower Hunter Biden should have been charged with a tax felony, because in his experience, and by the letter law, that’s what all of those who’ve done what Hunter did are charged with. The gay Democrat, who’s married to a man, also said the prosecution didn’t follow the ordinary processes, threw up deliberate roadblocks to impede the investigation and blocked investigators from being able to interview key witnesses. The homosexual whistleblower also called for something many of us have called for, for quite a while. A special counsel to be appointed specifically targeting Hunter Biden’s activities, the potential involvement of his father, and the obstruction of justice from the Justice Department itself. Meanwhile, the non-gay Democrat who’s not married to a man, Gary Shapley – who has been public and vocal in recent weeks – testified that prosecutors deliberately concealed evidence from Hunter Biden’s laptop from the investigators. He testified to the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Delaware holding up all necessary investigative functions, like the issuance of search warrants until after the 2020 election. Shapley stated the warrants were ready in April of 2020. And yes, the straight Shapley testified that in fact Hunter Biden’s iCloud account contained the WhatsApp messages with several Chinese Communist Controlled executives – including the prodding of them for money – with his dad ‘ole Joe sitting next to him. As Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer stated at the onset of the hearing – the Committee has uncovered twenty shell companies used by the Bidens to funnel over $10 million from foreign interests in China, Ukraine, and Romania in an “influence peddling scheme”. The two whistleblowers' testimony corroborates those findings. So, where’s justice? Well, Ranking Member Jamie Raskin made the case that it was served because Hunter Biden pled guilty to a misdemeanor tax charge and felony gun charge. He still wants you to believe that the whistleblowers are wrong, and also that Hunter Biden became a Burisma board member making millions through legitimate means. Ditto the Chinese Communist Party and also with a Romanian taken down for corruption in Romania. There’s an undeniable pattern of preferential treatment for Democrats, and you don’t need to be an IRS special agent investigating Hunter Biden to know this. You just need to have your eyes open and even a hint of intellectual integrity. Everyone should listen to and/or read the testimony of the two IRS whistleblowers. It speaks directly to everything those with a hint of intellectual integrity already knew. And the reason this matters...
- Is you. It’s easy for people to think that this stuff doesn’t really matter to them, but it does. We already know the Justice Department targeted Tea Party and conservative related groups over a decade ago. They were forced to admit guilt and settle with targeted victims and yet that didn’t stop the corruption. We know that the Justice Department targeted concerned parents at school board meetings as potential domestic terrorists. An effort which was revealed through congressional investigation meant to suppress turnout and to intimidate concerned parents against speaking out against the interests of teachers' unions in school board meetings. More recently, the Justice Department sought to investigate Catholic Churches for “suspicious activity” until that was brought to the light of day and was forced to be rescinded. Now let’s be mindful that these are just the alarming examples of an abuse of power to protect political interests at your expense that we know about. If the DOJ gets away with this undeniable pattern of preferential treatment – what does it mean to you? Up to now, when obviously wrong and corrupt influences have targeted us – they've stopped. But now, if there’s obviously wrong and corrupt influences acting on behalf of the President of the United States and his son – will it really stop when it’s targeting you, and for that matter the 1st Amendment in the future?