Democrats Want Maximum Voter Fraud & The Real Shutdown Battle Begins - Top 3 Takeaways
Takeaway #1: Democrats want Maximum Voter Fraud
As I’m inclined to say, there are two sides to stories and one side to facts. It’s a fact that congressional Democrats, except for four, want maximum opportunity for voter fraud. Their constituents don’t but the elected Democrat officials, they do. That's not an opinion, that’s not a conjecture. That’s stone-cold, iron-clad, indisputable fact. How can I back up such a claim? It’s simple. Actions always speak louder than words. And actions continue to be crystal clear. The SAVE Act, or the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act isn’t a new idea, it isn’t even a new bill. The legislation, which would do two simple things 1) Mandate that someone is a legal citizen to register to vote 2) Mandate voter ID when you vote...passed the House of Representatives in April of last year with the support of four Democrats – none of whom are in Florida. So, on that note, it’s worth pointing out in this midterm election year Florida’s Congressional Democrats – The Hat (Frederica Wilson), The Thief (Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick), The Clueless Lois Frankel, The Fixer (Debbie Wasserman) and Darren Soto, Maxwell Frost, Kathy Castor and Jared Moskowitz all voted for maximum voter fraud to be able to take place. As I’ve pointed out many times over the years, Florida’s Democrat delegation is consistently a disgrace. There’s no distance between them and the most radical members of their party when votes cast in Congress are considered. No, no elected Democrat in congress has explicitly admitted that they want maximum voter fraud. Yes, they’ve voted for it by rejecting the SAVE Act. Within the past week, Senators Rick Scott and Mike Lee have tried to leverage the remaining government funding bills to a vote in the Senate on the SAVE Act. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, along with his fellow Senate Democrats, are filibustering to prevent a vote saying this week: (the SAVE ACT) is dead on arrival in the Senate. Instead, he continues to say and do what liars on the Left who want maximum voter fraud to say: It is about suppressing voters. The SAVE Act seeks to disenfranchise millions of American citizens. The SAVE Act is reminiscent of Jim Crow era laws and would expand them to the whole of America. Ahh yes, the ‘ole when you don’t know just say Jim Crow. The irony of course is that the Act seeks to enfranchise every American citizen by seeing to it that only American citizens can vote. And for some reason Chuck Schumer continues to apparently think that only Asian, Hispanic and White people are capable of producing a valid ID. According to Gallup, mandatory citizenship and voter ID is as bipartisan of a position as there is in politics today. 84% of Americans support: Requiring all voters to provide photo identification at their voting place in order to vote. With 83% who want to: Require people who are registering to vote for the first time to provide proof of citizenship. And here’s the thing...
Takeaway #2: 80% of Black voters say they want mandatory voter ID!
I guess Chuck Schumer thinks almost all Black voters want to bring back Jim Crow too. But of course the official line from the Left is that there’s no such thing as meaningful voter fraud...except of course for this...Since 1982 there have been 1,620 proven cases of voter fraud. There have been 1,382 criminal convictions for voter fraud related to those cases. There has been proven voter fraud in all 50 states. There has been evidenced voter fraud in every election cycle. There have been 13 criminal convictions for voter fraud within the past year – including one that took place within Florida. That’s an average of 38 cases of voter fraud that are uncovered and successfully prosecuted per year (let alone whatever we don’t know – and that's aside of whatever the FBI might find in Fulton County). Something tells me this is something that Chuck Schumer already knows, and that’s why he defaults to the absurd reference of Jim Crow. Meanwhile...
Takeaway #3: The shutdown is over the real battle begins
So yesterday the partial government shutdown (that once again didn’t have any impact on the average American), ended. But what’s really about to begin is the biggest fight over ICE we’ve had yet. Yesterday I shared the latest research showing that effectively almost all Democrats are now onboard with abolishing ICE entirely. And by that I’m talking about constituents, not politicians. It’s beyond me how the average Democrat living the typical life, trying to raise the typical family could possibly be onboard with keeping criminal illegal immigrants in their communities and in proximity to their kids. Or, regardless of political preferences, thinking that the United States shouldn’t have any immigration police. So that basically, if you end up here, no matter how it happened, you should be allowed to stay here. It’s likely in part due to misinformation that’s peddled on the Left that says illegal immigrants are less likely to commit crimes than American citizens (which as I’ve illustrated at length over the years is blatantly untrue – and most recently they’re 914% more likely to commit crimes than you). But regardless, the Trump administration has averaged removing 1,295 criminal illegal immigrants per day since Donald Trump once again became President of the United States. Crime has decline by double-digit percentages during this time which is no surprise given that approximately 25% of all crime that was committed across the country by the end of the Biden administration was due to illegal immigration. I already have significant long-term fears about what will happen the next time a Democrat is elected as president – but what can’t happen is backtracking in the present. Elected Democrats have already stated that they want to restrict ICE to only detain those with an arrest warrant (which will never be issued by activist local judges in the most impacted communities), to prevent ICE officers from concealing their identity despite widespread doxxing and to put an end to detention centers among other things. They can’t be allowed to win on this, and it’s currently unclear where this issue is going from here. DHS is only funded for two weeks currently. There are many reasons President Trump is likely right that Republicans should consider eliminating the legislative filibuster, which is something Democrats will likely do the next time they’re in power if Republicans haven’t done it by then too. But if Democrats dig in on these demands...what exactly would it be that GOP leadership would do?