President Biden may have thought that issuing a blanket pardon for his son Hunter Biden would end any investigations into his or his family’s crimes. But attorney Alan Dershowitz tells Glenn that it may have actually done the opposite. Dershowitz explains how Hunter can still be questioned and the truth unearthed. He also weighs in on the acquittal of Daniel Penny, which he believes was the correct ruling in a case that should never have been tried.
Transcript
Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors
GLENN: So probably -- well, he's definitely the most famous lawyer, of my lifetime.
And I think, the most important lawyer, in my lifetime, maybe in the last 100 years.
Alan Dershowitz.
He's a Harvard Law school professor, emeritus. He's also the host of his podcast, the Dershow.
And we wanted to get him on, to talk a little bit about Daniel Penny and a few other things.
Hello, Alan. How are you?
ALAN: First of all, will you send my very best to Senator Lee. His father and I were co-clerks together, 60 years ago, in the Supreme Court. And we had launch together every day. Why?
Why? Because he was a Mormon and couldn't have coffee, and I was an Orthodox Jew. And couldn't have almost anything. So we set the table.
And we were -- and we would schmooze and talk about everything.
And his father, you know, Rex, who was the solicited general, was a great, great man. And I think Senator Lee is a great man too.
And I hope he plays a major, major role, in the coming administration.
GLENN: I tell you, I hope he becomes a Supreme Court justice.
I -- I -- I think he truly cares about what the Founders meant and about the Constitution.
I mean, everything he does, it's all based in the Constitution. I will definitely pass it on.
ALAN: Yep. And it's based on his father. I can tell you that the apple doesn't fall far from the tree.
His father was an amazing constitutional scholar. The dean of Brigham Young Law School.
You know, the guy was -- he would have been the greatest Supreme Court justice. Unfortunately, he died very young.
So, Alan, first of all, how have you been?
I know -- I think you came out and said, you couldn't vote for Joe Biden.
I know things got really ugly for you. Have things gotten better at all for you?
ALAN: Well, I'm in Florida now. Everybody loves me in Florida. As long as I'm in Martha's vineyard, I'm doing great.
You know, my hat is split. Half the people come up to me, yell and scream at me.
And half the people come up to me and tell me how much they admire me. I wear a hat in New York saying, proud American Zionist.
And --
GLENN: Wow.
ALAN: And, you know, I get people talk to me about that, as well.
So, you know, when people come up to me and say, I hate you. I never know. Is it for Trump? Is it for Israel?
Is it for who I represent?
I never know.
GLENN: I love that. I love that.
ALAN: That's what happens when you're a controversial lawyer.
GLENN: Yeah. So let's start with Daniel Penny.
ALAN: Before you do that. I want to wait. After I get off the air. I want to hear you defend Black Lives Matter.
I don't know if you heard yesterday, the head of Black Lives Matter. Turned to penny in the courtroom, and said, hey, buddy. This is a small world.
And then he went outside. And he talked about strangling people. And being violent.
I'm not such a big fan of Black Lives Matter.
GLENN: So I'm not a fan of -- I can't defend what he said, personally.
To Daniel Penny?
But when he said, what would happen -- you know, they -- there's no justice. No peace.
What would happen, maybe we should start, you know, killing people every time they oppress us.
I believe that's constitutionally protected speech.
It's ugly. It's awful.
But what is that -- that test called?
Stu.
STU: The Brandenburg.
GLENN: The Brandenburg.
ALAN: Look, I agree with you. But he said it in front of a crowd of people. That were surrounding white people.
Then it would be an incitement. But if he said it in the abstract. In an interview. It's just despicable and disgusting.
It reminds me of what you Justice Brennan once said.
Justice Brennan wrote an opinion saying, that the Constitution protected to burn the American flag.
And he was -- what would you do, if you saw somebody burning an American flag, and Justice Brennan, who was about five-three tall. Said, I would walk up to him, and I would punch him in the mouth. And then I would defend his Constitutional rights.
GLENN: So that is -- so let me ask you. Because we've had a debate here. Before we went on the air, where I told Stu. I said, I think I'm going to use this as an example.
Because people, they always say, oh, you know.
Speech has limits. And, you know, you can't cry fire in a crowded.
Yes, you can!
Unless it leads to, you know, a stampede.
ALAN: Or is likely. Is likely. It doesn't to have lead. But it's likely to lead.
No, I think you're right. And I think you're right also from a conservative point of view, to be defending free speech for all. We can't live in a world in which it's free speech for me. But not for thee.
GLENN: Exactly right.
ALAN: I defended the right of Palestinian kids to put up a flag -- Palestinian flag to commemorate the death of Yasser Arafat.
And then when they put up the flag, I defended them. And I got them to be able to put up the flag. I hated that.
And then I got up there and I said, well, Yasser Arafat died.
It was too late. If he only died four years earlier, there might have been a resolution in the Middle East.
So I'm with you on the very expansive view of free speech.
GLENN: Yeah. Do you think we're moving -- I -- sense a shift, that maybe some of this craziness, is -- we're waking up to it. Do you feel that way?
ALAN: I wish you were right. I hope you're right.
Not on the left. The left is so goddamned self-righteous. They think that free speech.
Due process. The right to counsel was written for them.
They have Harvard law school, defending them.
Try believing the Constitution. It was written to promote the Democratic Party.
And every constitutional issue he's involved in. You know what his position is going to be.
Is it good for the Democrats?
If it's good for the Democrats. If it's good for the left. For the radicals.
And the constitutional Framers and candidates.
And fits bad for them. No. We can't have that for the constitutional law.
I don't think we're gaining any ground.
But the university campuses -- but I think we're gaining ground in the general public.
Now, I think maybe the Penny result shows that.
GLENN: Yeah.
RICHARD: I think Penny -- I think the case in Minneapolis, might have been decided a little differently today than it was years ago, when he was convicted and still is in jail.
I was thrilled by the -- by the verdict in the -- in the Penny case. And I think it sends a powerful message. I also think that the hung jury, you know, I thought the hung jury might have been six-six, five-seven. But obviously, the quick verdict on Monday morning, suggests that the hung miss on Friday, was probably ten to two or 11 to one in favor of acquittal. So that I think -- you know, look, that case should have never been brought. And the district attorney should not be the district attorney.
He should be defeated. He, not only brought this case. He brought that made up case against Donald Trump. And now he wants to prevent Donald Trump from appealing, by saying, well, we'll put the sentence off for four years.
We will hold the sort of Damocles over your head for four years.
I'm going to able to campaign for office, saying, I've got a conviction against Donald Trump. And he didn't get it reversed on appeal.
And I think it's -- it's disgusting. He's the worst districting district attorney in my lifetime in New York history.
And, remember, that's an office that had -- that had -- that had -- and now it has Alvin Bragg! Oh, my God. It's a disgrace.
GLENN: So let me ask you. Because we were talking about what he did on Friday. And what the judge allowed.
You have to have -- if you have a hung jury, on the first count.
You can't move to the second count.
It's a hung jury, and you have to have a retrial, right?
It's a mistrial.
ALAN: Unless, the defense asks to you consent for it.
Which often happens. But it didn't happen in this case.
So he dismissed the higher count. And allowed the jury to deliberate the lower count.
Look, in the end, that was good for Penny. Because there's double jeopardy there. You can't be tried on either counts. Because the first count was dismissed. To have
It wasn't hung. It was dismissed.
And that means it was jeopardy, and the second it was an acquittal.
So he's free. It's a civil lawsuit against him. But he will win that civil lawsuit. It will probably never get past the motion to dismiss because the person bringing it, it wasn't a father who had nothing to do with the son. He had no relationship with the son.
He became the father only after the killing. In order to gain publicity from it.
GLENN: So he has basically no standing. Is that what you're saying?
ALAN: I don't think he has a real standing to bring the lawsuit. And what's his damages?
You know, it's very hard to figure out, what they are.
And more over, a jury found, that there was no causation of death.
There was justification.
So I -- I don't think that the lawyer is interested in the money.
Or even a publicity at this point. Are going to want to bring that case forward.
I think it will be dropped. It's not like a DOJ case. Where clearly there was a strong civil case after he was acquitted.
And he won the civil case, although he didn't collect any money.
GLENN: Let me switch to politics here.
There are things. Like, I believe Anthony Fauci should be investigated. They've already investigated him in Congress.
But it should go through a court of law. And if he's found to have done the things that we now believe he did.
There should be some sort of penalty for him. And anybody else that was involved.
I don't care, right, left, Republican, Democrat.
We can allow this kind of stuff to happen.
Now, Biden is -- they suspect. So we're just speculating here. That he may pardon him in advance.
Is that even possible?
Before you're charged.
ALAN: Where a connection was pardoned. Not only before he was charged. But before there was any criminal investigation.
He was charged -- he was pardoned.
And the pardon power, as you said in your introduction.
Why don't we have a kingly pardon power?
It's the only residents of the British rule over the United States.
GLENN: Correct.
ALAN: There's nothing else in the Constitution, which so emulates the absolute power of kings, than the power to pardon and commute. It's without restrictions.
And it's without the need to explain.
And, by the way, you don't even need a document. As soon as President Biden said, I pardon my son, that act was completed.
And, by the way, you don't have to accept the pardon. Even if you reject the pardon.
And, by the way, there are some people who have already said, that if Trump pardons me, or if Biden pardons me, I will reject the pardon. Because a pardon makes it sound like I did something wrong.
GLENN: Wrong. Yeah.
RICHARD: The Supreme Court under Oliver Wendell Holmes in about 1926, rendered a decision, in a case called Bittle versus Petrovic (phonetic).
Which said, you can't reject the pardon. The pardon is an act of government. It's like immunity. If you're given immunity, you can't reject immunity. You have to testify, if you're given immunity. If you're given a pardon, you also have to testify.
I think Biden made a big mistake by pardoning his son.
He should have commuted his sentence. By pardoning the son. He opens the son up to asking any question at all.
About his criminal background. And his association with anything else.
Including his father.
Whereas, if he gave only a commutation of the sentence, it would mean he doesn't go to jail for a single day, but still can invoke his Fifth Amendment privilege.
So I think it's a blunder on the part of President Biden who is a lawyer, but didn't understand the consequences of a pardon.
As distinguished of the consequences of a computation.
GLENN: Do you think anybody is going to go after him though?
Because there's nothing politically to gain.
I think this is extraordinarily important on principle.
We cannot have people selling the power of the office.
RICHARD: Look, I agree with you.
And it's been part of politics for a long, long time.
I have to tell you, I think Trump has a warm spot in his heart for the Biden family.
He showed some sympathy. For Hunter Biden.
For his addiction. For all of that.
I don't think he will try too pile on. Now, you know, whether or not traditional committees -- get the choice of being held in contempt or perjury.
That's a different question. But I don't think Trump will do it. I think he's going to move on.
He wants to have a great four years. I want him to have a great four years.
You know, I'm not a Republican. But I'm a patriarch. I want to see every American president succeed. I have helped every American president. I have consulted and advised them since Jimmy Carter.
And I will then continue to do it. Any president that asks for my help, done. I'm giving it.
GLENN: That's the way it should be. Thank you so much, Alvin. I really appreciate it your friendship. And it's an honor to know you.
Really is. To have you on the program.
ALAN: Well, you're a great man.
And it's great to have a conservative who so believes in the Constitution and free speech.
And, again, send my best to Senator Lee. He's a great man.
GLENN: I sure will. I will. Thanks.
Alan Dershowitz. You can find him on the Dershow. The website is Dersh.Substack.com.